[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Li updated HADOOP-10281:
------------------------------
Description:
The Scheduler decides which sub-queue to assign a given Call. It implements a
single method getPriorityLevel(Schedulable call) which returns an integer
corresponding to the subqueue the FairCallQueue should place the call in.
The HistoryRpcScheduler is one such implementation which uses the username of
each call and determines what % of calls in recent history were made by this
user.
It is configured with a historyLength (how many calls to track) and a list of
integer thresholds which determine the boundaries between priority levels.
For instance, if the scheduler has a historyLength of 8; and priority
thresholds of 4,2,1; and saw calls made by these users in order:
Alice, Bob, Alice, Alice, Bob, Jerry, Alice, Alice
* Another call by Alice would be placed in queue 3, since she has already made
>= 4 calls
* Another call by Bob would be placed in queue 2, since he has >= 2 but less
than 4 calls
* A call by Carlos would be placed in queue 0, since he has no calls in the
history
Also, some versions of this patch include the concept of a 'service user',
which is a user that is always scheduled high-priority. Currently this seems
redundant and will probably be removed in later patches, since its not too
useful.
was:
The Scheduler decides which sub-queue to assign a given Call. It implements a
single method getPriorityLevel(Schedulable call) which returns an integer
corresponding to the subqueue the FairCallQueue should place the call in.
The HistoryRpcScheduler is one such implementation which uses the username of
each call and determines what % of calls in recent history were made by this
user.
It is configured with a historyLength (how many calls to track) and a list of
integer thresholds which determine the boundaries between priority levels.
For instance, if the scheduler has a historyLength of 8; and priority
thresholds of 4,2,1; and saw calls made by these users in order:
Alice, Bob, Alice, Alice, Bob, Jerry, Alice, Alice
* Another call by Alice would be placed in queue 3, since she has already made
>= 4 calls
* Another call by Bob would be placed in queue 2, since he has >= 2 but less
than 4 calls
* A call by Carlos would be placed in queue 0, since he has no calls in the
history
> Create a scheduler, which assigns schedulables a priority level
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10281
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10281
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Chris Li
> Attachments: HADOOP-10281.patch, HADOOP-10281.patch
>
>
> The Scheduler decides which sub-queue to assign a given Call. It implements a
> single method getPriorityLevel(Schedulable call) which returns an integer
> corresponding to the subqueue the FairCallQueue should place the call in.
> The HistoryRpcScheduler is one such implementation which uses the username of
> each call and determines what % of calls in recent history were made by this
> user.
> It is configured with a historyLength (how many calls to track) and a list of
> integer thresholds which determine the boundaries between priority levels.
> For instance, if the scheduler has a historyLength of 8; and priority
> thresholds of 4,2,1; and saw calls made by these users in order:
> Alice, Bob, Alice, Alice, Bob, Jerry, Alice, Alice
> * Another call by Alice would be placed in queue 3, since she has already
> made >= 4 calls
> * Another call by Bob would be placed in queue 2, since he has >= 2 but less
> than 4 calls
> * A call by Carlos would be placed in queue 0, since he has no calls in the
> history
> Also, some versions of this patch include the concept of a 'service user',
> which is a user that is always scheduled high-priority. Currently this seems
> redundant and will probably be removed in later patches, since its not too
> useful.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
