[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Li updated HADOOP-10281:
------------------------------

    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> Create a scheduler, which assigns schedulables a priority level
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10281
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10281
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Chris Li
>            Assignee: Chris Li
>         Attachments: HADOOP-10281.patch, HADOOP-10281.patch, 
> HADOOP-10281.patch, HADOOP-10281.patch
>
>
> The Scheduler decides which sub-queue to assign a given Call. It implements a 
> single method getPriorityLevel(Schedulable call) which returns an integer 
> corresponding to the subqueue the FairCallQueue should place the call in.
> The HistoryRpcScheduler is one such implementation which uses the username of 
> each call and determines what % of calls in recent history were made by this 
> user.
> It is configured with a historyLength (how many calls to track) and a list of 
> integer thresholds which determine the boundaries between priority levels.
> For instance, if the scheduler has a historyLength of 8; and priority 
> thresholds of 4,2,1; and saw calls made by these users in order:
> Alice, Bob, Alice, Alice, Bob, Jerry, Alice, Alice
> * Another call by Alice would be placed in queue 3, since she has already 
> made >= 4 calls
> * Another call by Bob would be placed in queue 2, since he has >= 2 but less 
> than 4 calls
> * A call by Carlos would be placed in queue 0, since he has no calls in the 
> history
> Also, some versions of this patch include the concept of a 'service user', 
> which is a user that is always scheduled high-priority. Currently this seems 
> redundant and will probably be removed in later patches, since its not too 
> useful.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to