[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14215105#comment-14215105
]
Gera Shegalov commented on HADOOP-11309:
----------------------------------------
Thanks, [~sjlee0], for review!
Clarity is a subjective matter. I find redundant parentheses distracting
especially when indentation has already been used to emphasize the grouping of
operators as in this case. I leave it to committers if they have a strong
preference one way or another.
> System class pattern package.Foo should match package.Foo$Bar, too
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11309
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11309
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.5.0, 2.6.0
> Reporter: Gera Shegalov
> Assignee: Gera Shegalov
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-11309.v01.patch
>
>
> Currently when job classloader is enabled and the user specifies
> {{package.Foo}} as a system class explicitly, nested classes are not
> considered system classes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
