[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14243620#comment-14243620
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-11398:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12686739/HADOOP-11398-121114.patch
  against trunk revision 5b9fced.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}.  The patch appears to introduce 3 new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5249//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5249//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshadoop-common.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5249//console

This message is automatically generated.

> RetryUpToMaximumTimeWithFixedSleep needs to behave more accurately
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-11398
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11398
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Li Lu
>            Assignee: Li Lu
>         Attachments: HADOOP-11398-121114.patch
>
>
> RetryUpToMaximumTimeWithFixedSleep now inherits 
> RetryUpToMaximumCountWithFixedSleep and just acts as a wrapper to decide 
> maxRetries. The current implementation uses (maxTime / sleepTime) as the 
> number of maxRetries. This is fine if the actual for each retry is 
> significantly less than the sleep time, but it becomes less accurate if each 
> retry takes comparable amount of time as the sleep time. The problem gets 
> worse when there are underlying retries. 
> We may want to use timers inside RetryUpToMaximumTimeWithFixedSleep to 
> perform accurate timing. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to