[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14259226#comment-14259226
 ] 

Arpit Agarwal commented on HADOOP-10651:
----------------------------------------

Hi [~benoyantony],

The patch looks fine. Couple of comments on ServiceAuthorizationManager.java:
# Could you apply the coding style consistently? There are missing and extra 
whitespace in the added chunks.
# For protocolToMachineLists, could you add a comment similar to 
protocolToAcls. i.e. the first array entry is the set of allowed hosts and the 
second is the set of blocked hosts.

Also I think a couple of comments in TestServiceAuthorization.java need to be 
fixed. e.g. Lines 328 and 335, comments should start with "TestProtocol1...".

Thank you for updating the documentation.

> Add ability to restrict service access using IP addresses and hostnames
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10651
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Benoy Antony
>            Assignee: Benoy Antony
>         Attachments: HADOOP-10651.patch, HADOOP-10651.patch
>
>
> In some use cases, it make sense to authorize the usage of some services only 
> from specific hosts. Just like ACLS for Service Authorization , there can be 
> a list of hosts for each service and this list can be checked during 
> authorization. 
> Similar to ACLS, there can be a whitelist of ip and blacklist of ips. The 
> default whitelist will be * and default blacklist will be empty. It should be 
> possible to override the default whitelist and default blacklist. It should 
> be possible to define whitelist and blacklist per service.
> It should be possible to define ip ranges in blacklists and whitelists



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to