[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14291721#comment-14291721
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6221:
-----------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12694520/HADOOP-6221-008.patch
against trunk revision 7b82c4a.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5479//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5479//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RPC Client operations cannot be interrupted
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6221
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6221
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ipc
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HADOOP-6221-007.patch, HADOOP-6221-008.patch,
> HADOOP-6221.patch, HADOOP-6221.patch, HADOOP-6221.patch, HADOOP-6221.patch,
> HADOOP-6221.patch, HADOOP-6221.patch
>
>
> RPC.waitForProxy swallows any attempts to interrupt it while waiting for a
> proxy; this makes it hard to shutdown a service that you are starting; you
> have to wait for the timeouts.
> There are only 4-5 places in the code that use either of the two overloaded
> methods, removing the catch and changing the signature should not be too
> painful, unless anyone is using the method outside the hadoop codebase.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)