[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14313533#comment-14313533
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-11467:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12697642/HADOOP-11467.003.patch
  against trunk revision 260b5e3.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-auth.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5638//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5638//console

This message is automatically generated.

> KerberosAuthenticator can connect to a non-secure cluster
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-11467
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11467
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>            Assignee: Yongjun Zhang
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HADOOP-11467.001.patch, HADOOP-11467.002.patch, 
> HADOOP-11467.003.patch
>
>
> While looking at HADOOP-10895, we discovered that the 
> {{KerberosAuthenticator}} can authenticate with a non-secure cluster, even 
> without falling back.
> The problematic code is here:
> {code:java}
>       if (conn.getResponseCode() == HttpURLConnection.HTTP_OK) {    // <----- 
> A
>         LOG.debug("JDK performed authentication on our behalf.");
>         // If the JDK already did the SPNEGO back-and-forth for
>         // us, just pull out the token.
>         AuthenticatedURL.extractToken(conn, token);
>         return;
>       } else if (isNegotiate()) {                                   // <----- 
> B
>         LOG.debug("Performing our own SPNEGO sequence.");
>         doSpnegoSequence(token);
>       } else {                                                      // <----- 
> C
>         LOG.debug("Using fallback authenticator sequence.");
>         Authenticator auth = getFallBackAuthenticator();
>         // Make sure that the fall back authenticator have the same
>         // ConnectionConfigurator, since the method might be overridden.
>         // Otherwise the fall back authenticator might not have the 
> information
>         // to make the connection (e.g., SSL certificates)
>         auth.setConnectionConfigurator(connConfigurator);
>         auth.authenticate(url, token);
>       }
>     }
> {code}
> Sometimes the JVM does the SPNEGO for us, and path A is used.  However, if 
> the {{KerberosAuthenticator}} tries to talk to a non-secure cluster, path A 
> also succeeds in this case.  
> More details can be found in this comment:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10895?focusedCommentId=14247476&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14247476
> We've actually dealt with this before.  HADOOP-8883 tried to fix a related 
> problem by adding another condition to path A that would look for a header.  
> However, the JVM hides this header, making path A never occur.  We reverted 
> this change in HADOOP-10078, and didn't realize that there was still a 
> problem until now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to