[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14342973#comment-14342973
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-11648:
------------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12701794/HADOOP-11648-002.txt
against trunk revision 30e73eb.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5806//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5806//console
This message is automatically generated.
> set DomainSocketWatcher thread name explicitly
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11648
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11648
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: net
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Liang Xie
> Assignee: Liang Xie
> Attachments: HADOOP-11648-001.txt, HADOOP-11648-002.txt
>
>
> while working at HADOOP-11604, seems the current DomainSocketWatcher thread
> name is not set explicitly, e.g. in our cluster, the format is like:
> Thread-25, Thread-303670 or sth else. Here Thread-25 seems came from
> Datanode.initDataXceiver, and once this thread die, the Xceiver leak will be
> found. I think it'd better to set the thread name, so we can debug issue
> easier in further.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
