[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14350957#comment-14350957
 ] 

Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HADOOP-11656:
-----------------------------------------------

bq. Let's deduplicated jars and also separate the client? Shouldn't users get 
to depend on a thin client jar that doesn't also force them to pull and/or 
package server side code and all its dependencies?

If we can implement classpath isolation, they will not be pulling in all the 
dependencies.  And anyway, as I discussed earlier, the client has most of the 
same dependencies as the server code.  Getting rid of these dependencies (even 
if it's possible) is bad because it leads to more NIH and wheel-reinvention in 
the client code.

I don't oppose splitting out the client, but I also don't think it will solve 
any of the problems discussed here.

> Classpath isolation for downstream clients
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-11656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11656
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Sean Busbey
>              Labels: classloading, classpath, dependencies, scripts, shell
>
> Currently, Hadoop exposes downstream clients to a variety of third party 
> libraries. As our code base grows and matures we increase the set of 
> libraries we rely on. At the same time, as our user base grows we increase 
> the likelihood that some downstream project will run into a conflict while 
> attempting to use a different version of some library we depend on. This has 
> already happened with i.e. Guava several times for HBase, Accumulo, and Spark 
> (and I'm sure others).
> While YARN-286 and MAPREDUCE-1700 provided an initial effort, they default to 
> off and they don't do anything to help dependency conflicts on the driver 
> side or for folks talking to HDFS directly. This should serve as an umbrella 
> for changes needed to do things thoroughly on the next major version.
> We should ensure that downstream clients
> 1) can depend on a client artifact for each of HDFS, YARN, and MapReduce that 
> doesn't pull in any third party dependencies
> 2) only see our public API classes (or as close to this as feasible) when 
> executing user provided code, whether client side in a launcher/driver or on 
> the cluster in a container or within MR.
> This provides us with a double benefit: users get less grief when they want 
> to run substantially ahead or behind the versions we need and the project is 
> freer to change our own dependency versions because they'll no longer be in 
> our compatibility promises.
> Project specific task jiras to follow after I get some justifying use cases 
> written in the comments.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to