[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14566714#comment-14566714
]
Lewis John McGibbney commented on HADOOP-12021:
-----------------------------------------------
Hi Folks. The suggestions here have convinced me that the place to do this is
over in Nutch as it is certainly application specific and just causing too much
overhead in Hadoop. The text is not required in-memory within the Hadoop
Configuration object.
> Augmenting Configuration to accomodate <description>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12021
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12021
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: conf
> Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
> Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.3.0, 2.8.0
>
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2015-05-26 at 2.22.26 PM (2).png
>
>
> Over on the
> [common-dev|http://www.mail-archive.com/common-dev%40hadoop.apache.org/msg16099.html]
> ML I explained a use case which requires me to obtain the value of the
> Configuration <description> tags.
> [~cnauroth] advised me to raise the issue to Jira for discussion.
> I am happy to provide a patch so that the <description> values are parsed out
> of the various XML files and stored, and also that the Configuration class is
> augmented to provide accessors to accommodate the use case.
> I wanted to find out what people think about this one and whether I should
> check out Hadoop source and submit a patch. If you guys could provide some
> advice it would be appreciated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
