[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14574632#comment-14574632
]
Larry McCay commented on HADOOP-12059:
--------------------------------------
Yes, I understand. That's why I said the line is a bit blurry.
If you put it into ProviderUtils something like:
{code}
ProviderUtils.nestUriForLocalJavaKeyStoreProvider()
{code}
would work for me.
We probably should add a convenience method for the other provider as well - if
we add this.
I don't really feel that strongly about it.
The whole idea got me to thinking whether we needed to add a nestUri to the
provider interface but then we would need an instance of the provider to get
its implementation. Which got me to thinking that it is appropriate to be
static - which, in my mind, put us into the ProviderUtils class.
> S3Credentials should support use of CredentialProvider
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12059
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12059
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sean Busbey
> Assignee: Sean Busbey
> Attachments: HADOOP-12059.1.patch, HADOOP-12059.2.patch
>
>
> Right now S3Credentials only works with cleartext passwords in configs (as a
> secret access key or the URI). The non-URI version should use credential
> providers with a fallback to the clear text option.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
