[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643159#comment-14643159
 ] 

Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HADOOP-12261:
-----------------------------------------------

Thanks, [~alanburlison].  Can you post the patch here?  If it works on Jenkins, 
I suppose we can commit it, and that will get 32-bit working again.

I agree that the difficulty of setting up a Hadoop test environment is a big 
concern.  If you have any ideas for improving it, that would be great.  Perhaps 
a docker image with a working setup would help?  We also have a lot of tests 
with too-tight timeouts or big resource requirements that tend to fail on 
smaller build machines-- those should also be fixed.

[~aw], I was just pointing out that someday we will want to have a discussion 
about the costs and benefits of 32-bit support.  It looks like the proposed 
change is minor, so we can postpone that day.  I don't think your issues with 
the PMC and the other folks on the project are relevant here and I would 
appreciate it if you could stay focused.

> Surefire needs to make sure the JVMs it fires up fit within the memory 
> available
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-12261
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12261
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: test
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Alan Burlison
>            Assignee: Alan Burlison
>
> hadoop-project/pom.xml sets maven-surefire-plugin.argLine to include 
> -Xmx4096m. Allocating  that amount of memory requires a 64-bit JVM, but on 
> platforms with both 32 and 64-bit JVMs surefire runs the 32 bit version by 
> default and tests fail to start as a result. "-d64" should be added to the 
> command-line arguments to ensure a 64-bit JVM is always used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to