[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14723908#comment-14723908
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12334:
------------------------------------
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | pre-patch | 17m 19s | Pre-patch trunk compilation is
healthy. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | @author | 0m 0s | The patch does not contain any
@author tags. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | tests included | 0m 0s | The patch doesn't appear
to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are
needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | javac | 8m 28s | The patch appears to cause the
build to fail. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL |
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12753351/HADOOP-12334.04.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / caa04de |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/7562/console |
This message was automatically generated.
> Change Mode Of Copy Operation of HBase WAL Archiving to bypass Azure Storage
> Throttling after retries
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12334
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tools
> Reporter: Gaurav Kanade
> Assignee: Gaurav Kanade
> Attachments: HADOOP-12334.01.patch, HADOOP-12334.02.patch,
> HADOOP-12334.03.patch, HADOOP-12334.04.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-11693 mitigated the problem of HMaster aborting regionserver due to
> Azure Storage Throttling event during HBase WAL archival. The way this was
> achieved was by applying an intensive exponential retry when throttling
> occurred.
> As a second level of mitigation we will change the mode of copy operation if
> the operation fails even after all retries -i.e. we will do a client side
> copy of the blob and then copy it back to destination. This operation will
> not be subject to throttling and hence should provide a stronger mitigation.
> However it is more expensive, hence we do it only in the case we fail after
> all retries
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
