[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14969526#comment-14969526
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12334:
------------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 7s
{color} | {color:blue} docker + precommit patch detected. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
8s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
13s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 12s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
15s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
7s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
12s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 12s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m 0s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-azure in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_60.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m 13s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-azure in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_79.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red} 0m 26s
{color} | {color:red} Patch generated 1 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 10m 51s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.7.1 Server=1.7.1
Image:test-patch-base-hadoop-date2015-10-22 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12768076/HADOOP-12334.07.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-12334 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc mvninstall unit findbugs
checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux c219b199ed65 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/patchprocess/apache-yetus-28a3a3d/dev-support/personality/hadoop.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 4c0bae2 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_79 |
| Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_60
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_79 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| JDK v1.7.0_79 Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/7912/testReport/ |
| asflicense |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/7912/artifact/patchprocess/patch-asflicense-problems.txt
|
| Max memory used | 228MB |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus http://yetus.apache.org |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/7912/console |
This message was automatically generated.
> Change Mode Of Copy Operation of HBase WAL Archiving to bypass Azure Storage
> Throttling after retries
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12334
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tools
> Reporter: Gaurav Kanade
> Assignee: Gaurav Kanade
> Attachments: HADOOP-12334.01.patch, HADOOP-12334.02.patch,
> HADOOP-12334.03.patch, HADOOP-12334.04.patch, HADOOP-12334.05.patch,
> HADOOP-12334.06.patch, HADOOP-12334.07.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-11693 mitigated the problem of HMaster aborting regionserver due to
> Azure Storage Throttling event during HBase WAL archival. The way this was
> achieved was by applying an intensive exponential retry when throttling
> occurred.
> As a second level of mitigation we will change the mode of copy operation if
> the operation fails even after all retries -i.e. we will do a client side
> copy of the blob and then copy it back to destination. This operation will
> not be subject to throttling and hence should provide a stronger mitigation.
> However it is more expensive, hence we do it only in the case we fail after
> all retries
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
