it's not really 1 mbps so much it takes 2 minutes to start doing the reads.....
Ananth T Sarathy On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Scott Carey <[email protected]>wrote: > > On 8/19/09 10:58 AM, "Raghu Angadi" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Edward Capriolo wrote: > >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Edward Capriolo > >>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >>>>>> It would be as fast as underlying filesystem goes. > >>>> I would not agree with that statement. There is overhead. > > > > You might be misinterpreting my comment. There is of course some over > > head (at the least the procedure calls).. depending on you underlying > > filesystem, there could be extra buffer copies and CRC overhead. But > > none of that explains transfer as slow as 1 MBps (if my interpretation > > of of results is correct). > > > > Raghu. > > > Yes, there is nothing about distributing work for parallel execution that > is > going to make a single 20MB file transfer faster. That is very slow, and > should be on the order of a second or so, not multiple minutes. > Something else is wrong. > > >
