Hi. Thanks for the info.
What about JFS, any idea how well it compares to XFS? >From what I read, JFS is considered more stable then XFS, but less performing, so I wonder if this true. Also, Ext4 is around the corner and was recently accepted into kernel, so I wonder if anyone knows about this one. Regards. 2009/10/8 Tom Wheeler <[email protected]> > As an aside, there's a short article comparing the two in the latest > edition of Linux Journal. It was hardly scientific, but the main > points were: > > - XFS is faster than ext3, especially for large files > - XFS is currently unsupported on Red Hat Enterprise, but apparently > will be soon. > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Stas Oskin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the info, question is whether XFS performance justifies > switching > > from the more common Ext3? > > -- > Tom Wheeler > http://www.tomwheeler.com/ >
