>From what I understand, it's rather tricky to set up multiple secondary namenodes. In either case, running multiple 2ndary NNs doesn't get you much. See this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06280.html
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Stas Oskin <[email protected]> wrote: > To clarify, it's either let single SecNameNode to write to multiple NFS > exports, or actually have multiple SecNameNodes. > > Thanks again. > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Stas Oskin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I'm want to keep a checkpoint data on several separate machines for > backup, > > and deliberating between exporting these machines disks via NFS, or > actually > > running Secondary Name Nodes there. > > > > Can anyone advice what would be better in my case? > > > > Regards. > > >
