> data.replication = 2 > > A bit of topic - is it safe to have such number? About a year ago I heard > only 3 way replication was fully tested, while 2 way had some issues - was > it fixed in subsequent versions?
I think that's still a relatively untested configuration, though I'm not aware of any known bugs with it. I know of at least one cluster that uses 2-way replication. Note that 3-way replication is used both for availability and performance, though in a write benchmark 2-way replication should be faster than 3-way. Thanks, Eli
