Hi all,
Thanks for help Todd and Steve,
I configured Hadoop (0.20.2) again and I'm getting the same error (Function
not implemented).
Do you think it's a Hadoop bug?
This is the situation:
I've 28 nodes where just four are running the datanode.
In all other nodes the tasktracker in running ok.
The NN and JT are running ok.
The configuration of the machines is the same, its a nfs shared home.
In all machines the Java version is "1.6.0_17".
This is the kernel version of the nodes, note that are two versions and in
both the
datanode doesn't work. Just in the h0* machines.
ram...@lcpad:~/hadoop-0.20.2$ ./bin/slaves.sh uname -a | sort
a01: Linux a01 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a02: Linux a02 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a03: Linux a03 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a04: Linux a04 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a05: Linux a05 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a06: Linux a06 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a07: Linux a07 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a09: Linux a09 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
a10: Linux a10 2.6.27.11 #4 Fri Jan 16 22:32:46 BRST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ag06: Linux ag06 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
ag07: Linux ag07 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
bl02: Linux bl02 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
bl03: Linux bl03 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
bl04: Linux bl04 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
bl06: Linux bl06 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
bl07: Linux bl07 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
ct02: Linux ct02 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
ct03: Linux ct03 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
ct04: Linux ct04 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
ct06: Linux ct06 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
h01: Linux h01 2.6.32.9 #2 SMP Sat Mar 6 19:09:13 BRT 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
h02: Linux h02 2.6.32.9 #2 SMP Sat Mar 6 19:09:13 BRT 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
h03: Linux h03 2.6.32.9 #2 SMP Sat Mar 6 19:09:13 BRT 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
h04: Linux h04 2.6.32.9 #2 SMP Sat Mar 6 19:09:13 BRT 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
sd02: Linux sd02 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
sd05: Linux sd05 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
sd06: Linux sd06 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
sd07: Linux sd07 2.6.32.10 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 10:17:30 BRT 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
These are the java processes running on each clients.
Jjust the h0* machines are running ok.
ram...@lcpad:~/hadoop-0.20.2$ ./bin/slaves.sh pgrep -lc java | sort
a01: 1
a02: 1
a03: 1
a04: 1
a05: 1
a06: 1
a07: 1
a09: 1
a10: 1
ag06: 1
ag07: 1
bl02: 1
bl03: 1
bl04: 1
bl06: 1
bl07: 1
ct02: 1
ct03: 1
ct04: 1
ct06: 1
h01: 2
h02: 2
h03: 2
h04: 2
sd02: 1
sd05: 1
sd06: 1
sd07: 1
This is my configuration:
ram...@lcpad:~/hadoop-0.20.2$ cat conf/*site*
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="configuration.xsl"?>
<!-- Put site-specific property overrides in this file. -->
<configuration>
<property>
<name>fs.default.name</name>
<value>hdfs://lcpad:9000</value>
</property>
</configuration>
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="configuration.xsl"?>
<!-- Put site-specific property overrides in this file. -->
<configuration>
<property>
<name>dfs.replication</name>
<value>1</value>
</property>
</configuration>
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="configuration.xsl"?>
<!-- Put site-specific property overrides in this file. -->
<configuration>
<property>
<name>mapred.job.tracker</name>
<value>lcpad:9001</value>
</property>
</configuration>
Thanks in Advance,
Edson Ramiro
On 30 March 2010 05:58, Steve Loughran <[email protected]> wrote:
> Edson Ramiro wrote:
>
>> I'm not involved with Debian community :(
>>
>
> I think you are now...
>
