Hi Ted,

      Thank you for the suggestion. I enabled it using the Configuration
class because I cannot change hadoop-site.xml file (I am not an admin). The
situation is still the same --- it gets stuck at reduce 99% and does not
move further.

Regards,
Raghava.

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> You need to turn on yourself (hadoop-site.xml):
> <property>
>  <name>mapred.reduce.tasks.speculative.execution</name>
>  <value>true</value>
> </property>
>
> <property>
>  <name>mapred.map.tasks.speculative.execution</name>
>  <value>true</value>
> </property>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
> m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >     Thank you Eric, Prashant and Greg. Although the timeout problem was
> > resolved, reduce is getting stuck at 99%. As of now, it has been stuck
> > there
> > for about 3 hrs. That is too high a wait time for my task. Do you guys
> see
> > any reason for this?
> >
> >      Speculative execution is "on" by default right? Or should I enable
> it?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raghava.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Gregory Lawrence <gr...@yahoo-inc.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > > I have also experienced this problem. Have you tried speculative
> > execution?
> > > Also, I have had jobs that took a long time for one mapper / reducer
> > because
> > > of a record that was significantly larger than those contained in the
> > other
> > > filesplits. Do you know if it always slows down for the same filesplit?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Greg Lawrence
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/8/10 10:30 AM, "Raghava Mutharaju" <m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > >          I got the time out error as mentioned below -- after 600
> > seconds,
> > > that attempt was killed and the attempt would be deemed a failure. I
> > > searched around about this error, and one of the suggestions to include
> > > "progress" statements in the reducer -- it might be taking longer than
> > 600
> > > seconds and so is timing out. I added calls to context.progress() and
> > > context.setStatus(str) in the reducer. Now, it works fine -- there are
> no
> > > timeout errors.
> > >
> > >          But, for a few jobs, it takes awfully long time to move from
> > "Map
> > > 100%, Reduce 99%" to Reduce 100%. For some jobs its 15mins and for some
> > it
> > > was more than an hour. The reduce code is not complex -- 2 level loop
> and
> > > couple of if-else blocks. The input size is also not huge, for the job
> > that
> > > gets struck for an hour at reduce 99%, it would take in 130. Some of
> them
> > > are 1-3 MB in size and couple of them are 16MB in size.
> > >
> > >          Has anyone encountered this problem before? Any pointers? I
> use
> > > Hadoop 0.20.2 on a linux cluster of 16 nodes.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Raghava.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Raghava Mutharaju <
> > > m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >        I am running a series of jobs one after another. While executing
> > the
> > > 4th job, the job fails. It fails in the reducer --- the progress
> > percentage
> > > would be map 100%, reduce 99%. It gives out the following message
> > >
> > > 10/04/01 01:04:15 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id :
> > > attempt_201003240138_0110_r_000018_1, Status : FAILED
> > > Task attempt_201003240138_0110_r_000018_1 failed to report status for
> 602
> > > seconds. Killing!
> > >
> > > It makes several attempts again to execute it but fails with similar
> > > message. I couldn't get anything from this error message and wanted to
> > look
> > > at logs (located in the default dir of ${HADOOP_HOME/logs}). But I
> don't
> > > find any files which match the timestamp of the job. Also I did not
> find
> > > history and userlogs in the logs folder. Should I look at some other
> > place
> > > for the logs? What could be the possible causes for the above error?
> > >
> > >        I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 and I am running it on a cluster with
> 16
> > > nodes.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Raghava.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to