On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 14:35, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > I just read the malstone report. They report times for a Java version that > is many (5x) times slower than for a streaming implementation. That single > fact indicates that the Java code is so appallingly bad that this is a very > bad benchmark.
Slow Java code? That's funny ;) Running with Hotspot on by any chance? > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Jim Falgout <[email protected]>wrote: > >> We use MalStone and TeraSort. For Hive, you can use TPC-H, at least the >> data and the queries, if not the query generator. There is a Jira issue in >> Hive that discusses the TPC-H "benchmark" if you're interested. Sorry, I >> don't remember the issue number offhand. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shrinivas Joshi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 3:32 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: benchmark choices >> >> Which workloads are used for serious benchmarking of Hadoop clusters? Do >> you care about any of the following workloads : >> TeraSort, GridMix v1, v2, or v3, MalStone, CloudBurst, MRBench, NNBench, >> sample apps shipped with Hadoop distro like PiEstimator, dbcount etc. >> >> Thanks, >> -Shrinivas >> >> >
