>
>> 3. Another idea might be create separate seq files for chunk of
>> records and make them non-splittable, ensuring that they go to a
>> single mapper.  Assuming I can get away with this, see any pros/cons
>> with that approach?
>
> Separate sequence files would require the least amount of custom code.
>

Thanks for the response, Joey.

So, if I were to do the above, I would still need a custom record
reader to put all the keys and values together, right?

Thanks,

Tom

-- 
===================
Skybox is hiring.
http://www.skyboximaging.com/careers/jobs

Reply via email to