By the way, I don't see anything 0.22 based in the bigtop repos. Thanks -jeremy
On Feb 22, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > I guess I thought that backupnode would provide some level of namenode > redundancy. Perhaps I don't fully understand. > > I'll check out Bigtop. I looked at it a while ago and forgot about it. > > Thanks > -jeremy > > On Feb 22, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Joey Echeverria wrote: > >> Check out the Apache Bigtop project. I believe they have 0.22 RPMs. >> >> Out of curiosity, why are you interested in BackupNode? >> >> -Joey >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 22, 2012, at 14:56, Jeremy Hansen <jer...@skidrow.la> wrote: >> >>> Any possibility of getting spec files to create packages for 0.22? >>> >>> Thanks >>> -jeremy >>> >>> On Feb 22, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: >>> >>>> BackupNode is major functionality with change in required in RPC protocols, >>>> configuration etc. Hence it will not be available in bug fix release 1.0.1. >>>> >>>> It is also unlikely to be not available on minor releases in 1.x release >>>> streams. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Suresh >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Jeremy Hansen <jer...@skidrow.la> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> It looks as if backupnode isn't supported in 1.0.0? Any chances it's in >>>>> 1.0.1? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -jeremy >>> >
