> > Thanks for the reply Mathias, > Actual data is 100TB i think we need to host 100TB on AWS. >
It's also worth noting that besides storage costs, simply moving 100TB to AWS is not a trivial task. Import/Export ( http://aws.amazon.com/importexport/) has a limit of 16TB, although they do seem like they might be flexible for larger volumes. On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Sandeep Reddy P < sandeepreddy.3...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply Mathias, > Actual data is 100TB i think we need to host 100TB on AWS. Do we have > replication even in AWS?? > We are looking for comparision between performance curves/issues between > physical machines and AWS?? > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mathias Herberts < > mathias.herbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the sole cost of storing 300TB on AWS > > will account for roughly 300000*0.10*12 = 360000 USD per annum. > > > > We operate a cluster with 112 nodes offering 800+ TB of raw HDFS > > capacity and the CAPEX was less than 700k USD, if you ask me there is > > no comparison possible if you have the datacenter space to host your > > machines. > > > > Do you really need 10Gbe? We're quite happy with 1Gbe will no > > over-subscription. > > > > Mathias. > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > sandeep >
