Simple question: When I issue a "hadoop fs -du" command and/or when I view the 
namenode web UI to see HDFS disk utilization (which the namenode reports both 
as bytes and percentage), should I expect to see disk use reported as "true 
data size" or as replicated size (e.g. with 3X replication, should I expect 
reported values to be three times higher than the actual underlying data 
itself)?

Thanks.

________________________________________________________________________________
Keith Wiley     kwi...@keithwiley.com     keithwiley.com    music.keithwiley.com

"I used to be with it, but then they changed what it was.  Now, what I'm with
isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me."
                                           --  Abe (Grandpa) Simpson
________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to