On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:13:40 -0800 > From: Scott Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Release > > I personally believe that a fatal 'log' should just be an Exception, but > I could be wrong :) > What should the poor code that receives that exception do to let somebody know that something really bad happened? > Scott Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Release Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Morgan Delagrange
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Scott Sanders
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.... Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Scott Sanders
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Scott Sanders
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Scott Sanders
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.... Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Scott Sanders
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.... Tomasz Pik
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Loggin... Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0 Re... Paulo Gaspar
