Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>In case the general vote for moving commons-sql is positive, I would
>prefer to have it as a normal project (or a sandbox project if there is
>something like this in db) and initially give commit rights to all OJB
>and Torque committers. IMO this would make it easier (and less
>bureaucratic than with Incubation) to enhance commons-sql, e.g. by
>defining these requirements, writing tests and then creating/adopting
>the functionality.
Well, I'm fine with that. So let's get this through and then continue
on the -dev lists. :-)
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
What is more important to you...
[ ] Product Security
or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
-- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
