robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>the question i pose is: are we trying for a JCL 2.0 which in my mind
>would be a compatible evolution of JCL 1.0 aiming to solve all the
>major JCL 1.0 itches or are we aiming for a JCL 1.1 (better discover
>and factoring) plus additional pluggable modules...?
Personally, I'd like to aim for 1.1. These goals are already a good
step on the way to 2.0 and also address most of the PITAs (PsITA?)
that we currently have.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
What is more important to you...
[ ] Product Security
or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
-- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
