On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:08:50 +0100, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> We have been hoping to get a particular bug (the GC of scripts) fixed > >>> before RC2 was released. > >> I seem not to have heard any other complaints about Jelly since my > >> TagScript Tag-caching fix. > > Paul, I haven't seen the fix. Can you post me a pointer to it or was > > it committed to CVS? > > It was committed to CVS. > Maybe this was a too big move... I hope not!
I think a lot of the taglibs still point back to Jelly beta's or RC1. Should we upgrade them to point to a SNAPSHOT? That way we can test the taglibs against the latest Jelly. > >> - Did everyone close to jelly test enough ? > > Not me... > > Fine that we talk about it ! > (don't the CVS-commit mails reach you through commons-dev ?) Yep, they reach. I must've missed it in the holiday season. > >> - I have removed this method called setCacheTags(boolean)... was it > >> actually ever used? > >> - I have also removed TagScript.getTag() which would need ThreadLocal > >> (and we don't want them) > >> If both of these removals don't bother anyone, I'd close the issues > >> and > >> mark my changes. I wanted to have echoes ! > > > > I'd like some time to test it this week if that's ok. > > On to bug reporting! There should be very little left in core to fix for 1.0 :-) -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
