Ceki G�lc� wrote:

> Seriously, aren't you sick of JCL exploding with an
> LogConfigurationException at the most inappropriate times?

Actually, a few of us working on the eyebrowse migration kind of feel that
way about Log4J today.  log4j-1.1.3 and current don't have the same
behavior.  For details you'd have to talk with DLR.

FWIW, I notice that Craig and other participated in a thread on
"commons-logging & classloading" way back in '03:

http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200309.mbox/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

        --- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to