On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 13:07 -0500, Michael Heuer wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > On 11/12/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:44 +0000, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > > > has anyone run a long stress test? > > > > > > > > > > if not, i'm willing to code up something and set it running on my > > > > > debian > > > > > box for a few days. i'd appreciate a second pair of eyes on the code > > > > > (to > > > > > avoid mistakes). > > > > > > > > My attempt at one is attached to bugzilla - SoakLRUMap. I've only run it > > > > for an hour or so though. > > > > I ran something similar for two 3-hour runs with no errors, using a > > mix of Integer and String keys engineered to get a lot of reuse to > > happen. I did lots of shorter runs modifying the the number of > > buckets, number of threads, and relative frequency of adds / replaces, > > etc. It was easy to get the reported errors with synchronization off; > > but I saw no errors when access was properly synchronized. > > Just for the record, since everyone might not have access to these > platforms, I saw the same results as Phil while running SoakLRUMap > overnight on Mac OS X 10.4.3 dual-G4 and dual-G5 hardware with java > versions 1.4.2_09 and 1.5.0_05.
thanks for the information: it is appreciated :) the tests on my debian box have been running (so far) for over four days without an NPE. maybe we could collate all this on a wiki page? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
