On 12/5/05, Barnett, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've developed a version of SCXML that matches the spec's semantics more > closely (no superstep, single event queue, internal and external events > treated identically, etc.) <snip/>
This is great, thanks. > I am not going to check it in right away, > however, for two reasons: > > 1. I couldn't keep the changes local to the semantics component. > In particular I had to change SCXMLExecutor significantly (including > making it support the Runnable interface.) > 2. This is my first time programming in Java so I'm sure I messed > things up. > > > Maybe we could set up a phone call to discuss how to merge the changes > without breaking existing applications. We also need to discuss how to > make other changes needed to get in synch with the upcoming release of > the spec. And in any case, I would like someone to review my code > before it gets checked in. > <snap/> When you get a chance, please attach a patch to a bugzilla ticket, and we'll be glad to take a look at it. Bugzilla is here [1]. Some information related to filing tickets in bugzilla, specific to SCXML, is here [2]. -Rahul [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ [2] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/scxml/issue-tracking.html > > > - Jim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
