DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39340>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39340 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-19 23:36 ------- It appears that I may have made a mistake during my installation, as I am not able to recreate this problem today. The jar is being used by an EJB in WebLogic, so it is very likely that something just wasn't right with my installation. I have therefore marked the bug as resolved. Addressing the aside. You are correct Sandy, the QuoteVendorConnectionPool does extend the GenericKeyedObjectPool. My thinking was that I could save a lot of development time by extending the GenericKeyedObjectPool, rather than implementing one of the interfaces or extending an abstract class. Why reinvent the wheel, right? Regarding the connection validation, you are again correct. However, the connection protocol is optimistic and requires the use of a "heartbeat" message for validation. As the error handling and reconnect logic is the same for both a heartbeat message and a quote request message, I won't actually save any time by sending a heartbeat message first. I just send the quote request and in the case of failure attempt to reconnect. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
