Henri Yandell schrieb: > This is all that's left in 2.2 before an RC can be built. > > On 7/5/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Henri Yandell wrote: >> > Anyone know of any half-finished code in there at the moment? >> >> I think I'm on record for saying that the VariableFormatter class >> doesn't quite fit as is IMHO. But I've not spelt out why, so here goes... >> >> At a minimum, I'd like to see MapVariableResolver packge scoped. > > Reading the following in the threads, no one seems to be against > making MapVariableResolver package scoped. > > Personally I don't think we should have public nested classes, > especially if they're intended for extension. That might just be me > being a dumb user. > > VariableResolver is another public nested class (well interface). Any > reason to not have this be package scoped for the 2.2 release as well? >
Well I don't mind whether the the resolver is made package scoped as long as I can somehow subclass it (at my own risk) adding the MessageFormat.format() things. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
