On 8/16/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 8/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Author: ggregory
>> Date: Wed Aug 16 13:36:35 2006
>> New Revision: 432025
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432025&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Access to enclosing constructors is emulated by a synthetic accessor
>> methods. Increasing its visibility will improve your performance
>> (Eclipse compiler).
>>
> <snip/>
>
> I've seen this discussion numerous times on various forums and often
> it comes down to whether breaking the encapsulation is worth heeding
> the synthetic accessor warning (a search should yield many related
> results).
I'm comfortable with the change, but it should go to default scope, not
to protected scope. So I'm -0 to this particular checkin at present.
+1 to default scope.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
