On 10/20/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> collections5 ? (don't like collgenerics)
I would have suggested collections5 or collections15, but as has already
been pointed out, this is a little strange when JDK6 is about to come
out. Naming after the feature seems to make more sense.
<snap/>
There is a similar play with naming after a feature, clearly on due
(long term) evolution, the benefits of the "new" [collections] have
potential to exceed beyond just generics.
The 5 suffix in my mind has little to do with tiger, its just an
excuse that makes sense (and still has semblance of having the "new"
having come from the "old"). Though I'm hardly going to insist on any
name here.
-Rahul
That said, the advantage with using the name collections5 is that we
could use the same naming style for other projects - lang5, io5 etc.
By the way, I hope to split the jar before release, so the name may not
be *that* important right this second.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
