On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 09:48 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote: > On 11/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:53 +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > > thanks to everyone who commented on RC1 > > > > > > > > i've now cut an RC2 based on the feedback and uploaded the artifacts > > > > (only) to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. please > > > > check them. > > > > > > > > unless issues emerge, i'll finish off the process (javadocs, signatures > > > > and so on) and move to a VOTE. > > > > > > no further reports so i'll move towards a vote soon > > > > Sorry Robert, kept meaning to look at the rc, but not finding time - > > couple of comments: > > > > 1) The "xdocs" are missing from the source distro
applied > > 2) Adding "scope" elements to the xerces, xml-apis and junit > > dependencies in the project.xml will probably help maven 2 downstream > > users by not pulling in those dependencies > > Really important catch. applied is there anyway to get the maven folks to take a look at the project.xml before it's released rather than afterwards? > > 3) Don't know why, but everyone seems to have changed mail archive > > from eyebrowse > > Eyebrowse be dead. yep. applied > > 4) Add md5 checksums to the build would make creating the release easier. > > Wouldn't for me :) yeh - i prefer to use the scripts thanks for the review i've cut an RC3 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
