Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > I tested out 1.4 on some code I have using 1.3, which has some > expressions that resolve within the same configuration, but which is > located at a different prefix (via config-at). This broke under 1.4, as > it now assumes all interpolations need to happen in the parent. > > The feature is definitely useful - but should it first look inside the > subset, and then go to the parent if not found, rather than skipping > the subset altogether? > > Cheers, > Brett >
Brett, can you provide a short example code fragment (or even better a unit test) that demonstrates this behavior? I will have a look. Thank you. Oliver --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
