Hey all, This may be something so simple it goes without saying, but it also may be something that's easy to overlook.
The main value of commons collections is that it performs "intuitive" type checking. Collections can contain mixed types which are bounded on both the top and the bottom end. They can also be forced to contain only one type of object. This allieviates some of the practical problems with Java5 collections; namely you can't add anything to a Collection<? extends Object>. If you intend to retain this functionality, I believe the only legal way is to retain implementations of Collection (no generics). I would very much like to see this functionality retained. :) Please pardon me if this was an "obvious" email. Bryce --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
