I would expect a JDK change to be a major version number change.
Stephen
Gary Gregory wrote:
It seems like a nice coincidence that IO 1.3 is based on JRE 1.3, and we could
have IO 1.4 based on JRE 1.4, IO 1.5 on JRE 1.5 ;)
Thank you,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:10 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?
On 5/15/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are a couple of Jira tickets which require JDK 1.4
IO-74[1] - Regular Expression IOFileFilter implementation
IO-77[2] - FileUtils.move() method that uses NIO
Are there any objections to moving Commons IO's minimum requirement to
JDK 1.4 for Commons IO 1.4?
<snip/>
Sounds good. I've read the rest of the thread -- probably good to
branch regardless of whether both lines are under active
(evolutionary, in my mind) development or not. If someone shows up
with desire to do a point / bugfix release for JDK 1.3 etc.
-Rahul
Niall
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-74
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-77
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
