If the intention is to have a NullPointerException when null is passed, declare
it and throw it
specifically (that way you are in control of the exception). I think every
undocumented nullpointer
exception is a bug.
Mvgr,
Martin
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> + /**
>> + * Modify the normal distribution used to compute normal approximations.
>> + * The caller is responsible for insuring the normal distribution has
>> the
>> + * proper parameter settings.
>> + * @param value the new distribution
>> + * @since 1.2
>> + */
>> + public void setNormal(NormalDistribution value) {
>> + normal = value;
>> }
>
> Should we check for null parameters here and throw a NPE ourselves or
> simply allow null parameters and let the JVM throw the NPE when the
> distribution is used ?
>
> I am fine with the current choice of letting the JVM handle this by
> itself, I only wondered what others think about this.
>
> Luc
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
