On 11/2/01 3:44 PM, "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Yes, he could do that, but I thought he was saying that he wanted > Digester >>> to 'just know' to set the attribute, i.e. without defining specific > rules. >>> Which way were you looking for Jason? >> >> Yes, I know that addCallMethod() works. Works very well :-) But I don't > want >> to have to hand code the rules for every object I want to work with. >> > > That's Castor all right. I suppose we could start down that road, but I'm > not sure why we would want to re-invent the wheel, since Castor is even 2 > way. I decided 6 months ago that I was going to use digester for everything XML. I looked at Castor and the Digester and Castor seemed rather complex. I also will always favour an apache product, and it seems that robert has a rule that will do what I need. To boot, Craig is meticulous with the code that he releases and is highly responsive to requests for change so I'm not really interested in looking at Castor anymore. > Scott Sanders > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
