On 12/6/01 4:12 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/6/01 4:00 AM, "Christoph Reck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jason, >> >> could you deprecate those methods in the 'rupert' FileUtils? > > Sure, if you like. Though I don't really think it's necessary to deprecate > methods for classes that are in the sandbox. But I can do it if you like. It might be a nice courtesy to note that it was taken somewhere else, but you are right - I don't think it has to be deprecated. If someone wants to do something with rupert, they will have to deal with the overlap if they need to... > >> I guess some votes might be necessary for this... >> >> +1 from me (the rupert.christoph package was my contribution to find >> a place whithin commons, Geir went forward and made that strange >> package in the sandbox for it to be slaughtered and used :). >> >> :) Chirstoph >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> jvanzyl 01/12/05 08:04:43 >>> >>> Modified: util/src/java/org/apache/commons/util FileUtils.java >>> Log: >>> - combining some of the methods in the 'rupert' FileUtils class with >>> this one. >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
