On Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 11:41 PM, Mika Goeckel wrote:
> Rob, > > is that what you thought of? I got rid of the second interface by changing > 'Rule'. Seems more straightforward. hi mika you probably don't need to change the Rule interface. i'd prefer it if you call methods on the digester instance. (that's how the BeanPropertySetterRule automagically knows how to match the property called to the current element tag.) if the digester doesn't currently expose the property you're after, then it's easy to add it. > About other matching methods: Yes, I think other methods of matching > (XPath > i.e.) could come, but as long as the interface is backwards compatible, > selfconfiguring objects will continue to work. i don't think that different matching pattern rules will be a problem in practice provided that the self-configuring behaviour can be turned on and off. - robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
