----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > am i right in thinking that for legal reasons we need to > > include the complete license text in every source file (rather than just > > the short form)? > > > > My recollection is that you are correct ... we need to be using the long > form, at least for the version 1.1 license (i.e. the current one).
I thought I saw a mail go by a month or so ago whereby a short form of the licence was allowable in source files that refers the reader to a LICENSE.txt file? James _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
