From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My bet is that a very common usage pattern will be to use DynaBeans for > VOs and other sorts of simple data carrier classes, especially in the > prototype stage of a new application. Later on, you can improve > performance and/or add functionality by converting some or all of them to > real beans -- but even this transition can be hidden away if you're > accessing the properties indirectly via things like PropertyUtils.
Agreed. Another approach could be to extend DynaBeans with typesafe methods so that you get the best of both worlds, typesafety when required but still allowing runtime extensibility if needed. James _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
