A nice alternative to Sun's (a superset really) is the Elements of Java
Style. Highly recommended. 

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0521777682


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Sigh. That isn't the argument. The argument is about following what
> > conventions we do have. It could be about coding, voting policies,
> > whatever...if people ignore the rules, then we shouldn't bother having rules
> > at all.
> 
> I'm going through exactly this situation in my new employment. One great
> reasoning for ignoring the coding convention:
> 
> "Sun don't obey their coding convention internally. "
> 
> It seems to me to be a similar reason for why open source Java should use
> the Apache licence. It's the biggest fish we have to be a littler fish in
> other seas. My view on the OS Java world has been that the Apache
> licenced software is in the majority, would be nice to do the maths
> and see if that's true.
> 
> Arguing and fragmenting the 'standard' will cause the effectiveness of
> the community to fail, which is a shame as Sun's conventions, when obeyed,
> do create relatively homogenous code.
> 
> Bay
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to