Lance, >>Any thoughts for ARMI (though it needs a rename as "Async RMI" >>used). Is commons the place for it? Yes/No? >> > >Paul, > >Sorry I haven't had an opportunity to test ARMI yet, but thought I'd >chime in here anyway: >I always thought (somehow) that ARMI stood for "Alternative RMI" ;-) >
It does for me but the other (academic) team uses ARMI to mean "Asynchronous RMI". >And Commons seems a reasonable place for it, at least until it develops >enough audience/neccessity to become its own project (as Cactus did). > I'm going to roll in BCEL use soon. That could please more people. Regards, - Paul H -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
