----- Original Message ----- From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:34 PM Subject: Re: Latka code formatting
> On 1/7/02 6:44 PM, "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on 1/7/02 3:40 PM, "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> If Turbine can do it, why not us? :) > >> > >> - Morgan > > > > Correct. That is *exactly* what I want to see happen. > > > > The rule is, right now, that if you take the time to document your process > > by making a website out of it and getting sub-project agreement on it, then > > you can do it. > > > > That's interesting : why sub-project agreement? > > Don't the commons rules apply? I don't think Commons technically has a stance on code formatting. We discussed it way back when, but I don't think consensus was reached; the Sun convention is a footnote in the charter, but it's not really specified as a requirement. > (Yes, I'm stirring mud here - I actually fully support Latka doing what the > subcommunity wants to do, but there has been so much talk of sticking to the > letter of the guidelines, it's an interesting question to me...) Yes it seems to make sense to do it on a sub-project basis. If you're not an active committer for the code, you shouldn't really care how it is formatted. :) - Morgan _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
