WARN would be my inclination. INFO is more suited to high-level debugging than an ordinary production environment.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: [Logging] default log level > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:35 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [Logging] default log level > > > > Shouldn't the logging level be inherited from the > underlying logging > > > configuration? If I set a particular level in my Log4J > or JDK 1.4 > > > configuration file, *that* is what I want to use, right? > > > > Yes, for Log4J and LogKit and JDK1.4 this should be the > case, but for > > the SimpleLog, we need to pick one right? > > > > Thats true ... and I'm open to any of the choices. I just > didn't want to see us overriding the undelying logging > package's configuration. Agreed. I will go with Paolo on the choice of INFO. Scott > > > Scott > > > > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
